| 1 |
Angelo |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
0
|
1
|
| Last Week: 4 |
|
Eliminations |
1
|
1
|
0
|
Be within striking distance in the preseason rankings, win the first elimination challenge, and I figure that earns you the top spot, at least for the moment. His QF with Tiffany apparently had a salt issue, which'll put you in the bottom in a hurry, but we don't really know who was responsible for what components. Of course, as half the team, he should have been tasting and commenting even if the broth wasn't his responsibility. And he, uh, certainly hasn't hesitated to do so before, even when it wasn't welcome. On the elimination dish, however, he reworked one of his finale dishes, hand cut ramen with braised pork belly, pickled mushrooms and watermelon. Last season, the watermelon was a big focus of the dish. The "broth" for the ramen, so to speak. This time around, it's a bit of sweetened watermelon foam working more as an accent than a core part of the dish. Incidentally, from reading around, it appears that Angelo had little more than a couple of weeks off between seasons seven and eight. You could read that to mean he'll be sharp because he's already going full bore, or you could read that to mean that he'll be tired, coming off season seven and his Singapore illness. Remains to be seen.
|
| 2 |
Richard |
|
Quickfires |
1
|
1
|
0
|
| Last Week: 2 |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
1
|
0
|
Richard might have almost kicked off S8 with a double win. It hasn't been made clear, at least anywhere I could find, whether his dish would have been the winner had he not been disqualified. On the other hand, without those last-moment touches, perhaps he never would have even made Judges' Table. We can't say for sure. Which is precisely why disqualifying him from the win was the simple and correct answer. Tom mentions in his blog that once Richard was shown the tape, he understood the decision. So the guy makes mustard ice cream work, and then revamps his ill-fated finale pork belly and earns top mention. There's a recipe, but again, detail is lacking. There's mention at the table of the pork's crispy coating, but all the recipe instructs is to pressure cook it with lemongrass, Worcestershire, ginger and mirin. Clearly, we're missing something here. There are also radishes pickled with sugar, cider vinegar, ginger and coriander, and there's a cheddar and mirin foam. Gelatin figures in somewhere, but it's unclear how. Is my frustration showing, here? In any case, it sounds like a winner. Except for that whole plating past the buzzer thing. Slightly off-topic, I must confess that I'm puzzled by the amount of bile I've seen directed towards Richard this week for his comment about people remembering S4 for him choking. I kinda figured that we know enough about the elves' editing and he's built up enough goodwill that he'd get the benefit of the doubt on one out of context line like that, but... well, okay.
|
| 3 |
Tiffani |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
0
|
1
|
| Last Week: 1 |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
0
|
0
|
Tiffani didn't do much this week other than use too much raw garlic in her QF, apparently. Or maybe that was Stephen's fault. I'm intrigued by the idea of "cioppino gazpacho." Does that mean it was served chilled? Don't know. Her elimination dish looked like it was right in her sweet spot, creative but not overworked and heavily Italian-influenced. We know it struck a funny chord with Mike Isabella, but I wish we knew what the judges thought of it. In any case, while she didn't come up big in episode one, I don't really see any reason to drop her very far, so position three it is. In terms of how she works with others in the kitchen, I'm interested to see how she comes across this time around. As mentioned in the preseason rankings, she was kind of the original villainess, though time seems to have softened people's feelings about her. She mostly struck me as somebody who sometimes got prickly because she didn't suffer fools. And in season one, boy howdy, she was surrounded by plenty of fools. She's about the food, and kicking ass in the kitchen, and that's why she's pushing Stephen to get his plates in the pass as time's running out, even though he's her competition and clearly doesn't deserve the help. I'm reminded of one of our Iron Chef competitions, in which one of the members of the other team was a professional chef. When one of my dishes was going down in flames, he told me he felt weird not stepping in to help. "When you're in the kitchen, you pick each other up, no matter what." And at the risk of going all Psych 101, it seems to me that that's Tiffani. If you fall down, she'll pick you up, but you're going to hear about it because she doesn't have time for your crap.
|
| 4 |
Jennifer |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
1
|
0
|
| Last Week: 3 |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
0
|
0
|
Jen's off to a bit of a rough start, but I'm not going to drop her like a stone based on one solo dish. We've got too much history with her to not give her a chance to catch herself. And hopefully she will, because short of a brutal bottom appearance at Judges' Table, some "emperor has no clothes" kind of comments on her first solo dish are pretty much the worst possible thing that could happen to somebody who's shown the ability to fall apart quickly when confidence becomes an issue. I loved the concept behind hers and Mike's dish, fusing old-school mobster Vegas with modern day lobster tail decadence Vegas. And while I personally tend towards classic Italian, lobster should take to Carbonara beautifully. Wish I knew how they built the dish, but I love the idea. The duck issue is just puzzling. She was dead set on not oversalting it this time around. Was it flat because she overcompensated in the other direction? Just speculating.
|
| 5 |
Jamie |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
0
|
1
|
| Last Week: 9 |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
1
|
0
|
I don't know if she's going to be able to hang this high, but it's nice to be reminded that I'm not crazy for liking Jamie's style as much as I did the first time around. She definitely exudes a doesn't play well with others vibe, which many seem to feel will hurt her, but I'm not so sure. Without doing the math, I bet more talented chefs on this show have gone down because they didn't clearly delineate their contribution than because they weren't great team players. I'm not suggesting putting the team before yourself isn't admirable, I'm just suggesting that it isn't necessarily always the best way to win Top Chef. In any case, she gets the call-out as the good dish in her QF team's trio (even if it goes in the books as a bottom appearance), and despite her celery annoyance she turns the Ripert dish into her own and gets a top mention in the elimination. A strong start.
|
| 6 |
Casey |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
1
|
0
|
| Last Week: 6 |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
0
|
0
|
Ehhhh, I'm still uneasy about where I have Casey. But we don't need to be reminded that she can, in fact, cook. She seemed to have a central hand in generating her team's top-mentioned QF, and though she didn't make JT, her revamped braised pork belly with pickled peaches and whipped crème fraîche garnered some rather nice comments. So I'm going to punt on Casey for a week and see what happens.
|
| 7 |
Dale T. |
|
Quickfires |
1
|
1
|
0
|
| Last Week: 8 |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
0
|
0
|
Dale was another fellow who, like Jamie, impressed me foodwise before exiting a little early. And he's another one who came out of episode one looking pretty good. He made the sausage for the winning QF dish -- from scratch in 25 minutes, for those keeping score -- and then, as Bourdain so eloquently put it, got himself unf**ked with the infamous butterscotch scallops, which gave me some small sense of vindication as well. The last time around, most people felt that his dish was a disaster of a concept, but I had a hunch the concept was just fine. It's been a while since this came up, but caramel is sometimes used in a savory context in Vietnamese (and perhaps other SE Asian cuisines, I'm not certain). The trick is to burn it just enough to develop some bitter, savory notes. Too much and it's smoky char. Too little, and it's candy. A little more char, a little better balance to the sweetness... et voila! You're unf**ked.
|
| 8 |
Dale L. |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
1
|
0
|
| Last Week: 5 |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
0
|
0
|
A little good, a little bad for what I suppose you could call my sleeper pick. Consensus seems to be that I have Dale L. way too high, and maybe this is a bit of a correction, though I still have a hunch he's going to show stronger than most expect. He was in on the season three QF, though I'm not sure precisely in what capacity, and we know that a couple of the other contestants didn't like his dumplings, though I wish we could have heard something the actual judges had to say about them. I found that one surprising since he's Polish Lithuanian (thanks, tcfan) and from Chicago. The fellow should know by dumplings, and seemed to do fine with them in season three, which makes me wonder if this was a preference issue rather than a true technical issue. But I'll ding him a bit nonetheless, put him below a few of those who look like they might have just missed top mention, and see where he goes from here.
|
| 9 |
Marcel |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
0
|
1
|
| Last Week: 7 |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
0
|
0
|
On paper it's a two-position drop, but it isn't really. This is mostly a matter of Marcel treading water while a couple of others move past him. I'm not too troubled by the apple issue on his and Elia's QF dish. If the apple being a little bit too thin is the worst thing he can say, you're doing fine. Lack of seasoning on the shrimp is more troubling. His elimination dish certainly was something to behold (or was it beholding us?), and I hate that we didn't really get any comments about it other than that it was bold. So Marcel will hang out around the middle of the pack for now.
|
| 10 |
Mike |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
1
|
0
|
| Last Week: 11 |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
0
|
0
|
Between the aforementioned bucatini QF and a vegetarian elimination dish that got some nice comments, Mike should probably get a bigger bump. But he also pissed me off:
"Roast a leek, grill a leek, braise a leek, but It's still a leek." Mike, I'd like to introduce you to a friend of mine, Charleen Badman, the chef at FnB in Scottsdale, who braises leeks, melts some freshly-pulled mozzarella over the top, covers them with crisp mustard breadcrumbs and finishes the dish with a fried egg. It's vegetarian, it's all about the leeks despite the toppings, and it just made Food & Wine Magazine's Ten Best Restaurant Dishes of 2010. In short, you'd better not let Gail catch you saying that. So because you so blithely dismissed the noble leek, and because I'm still not 100% sold on you as a contender despite the fact that you held your own in what was probably the toughest season, I'm only bumping you one spot.
|
| 11 |
Antonia |
|
Quickfires |
1
|
1
|
0
|
| Last Week: 13 |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
0
|
0
|
I can envision a trajectory for Antonia's already. She's going to creep and creep and creep her way up as I refuse to believe that her style can take down some of those near the top. Well, I don't want that to happen. I do think she's a strong chef and I want to acknowledge that a little better this time around, but I also want her to make me. This was a pretty good start, being in on the QF win and making a pork sausage with pigeon pea puree and roasted cherry tomatoes that looked closer to Pork Jesus simple than Antonia circa S4 simple. Really, I like the look of this recipe a lot (though perhaps that's because it's one of the few I can actually look at). The sausage is done with cilantro, onion, garlic and annatto oil, and the pigeon pea puree works in chives, leeks and raisins. More of this, and I won't be singing the same tune as last time. But I want to know it's for real before I give her anything more than a modest bump.
|
| 12 |
Carla |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
0
|
1
|
| Last Week: 10 |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
0
|
0
|
Called out for issues in both the QF and elimination, Carla came out of the gate a little unevenly. But none of this was anything that was going to get her into trouble. She went beef and beef, first doing a ribeye with apple and then doing a very straightforward and Frenchified strip steak with herbed mashed potatoes, compound butter and a very, very classic looking red wine sauce. Stated as her objective, she's staying true to herself in the early running. As far as the issues go, we seem to be talking about things that need adjustment rather than things that are going to get her into trouble, so here's hoping she's just finding her sea legs.
|
| 13 |
Spike |
|
Quickfires |
1
|
1
|
0
|
| Last Week: 16 |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
1
|
0
|
Remember how I said a bad hand in this elimination could cut both ways? Case in point. If you made a pretty great dish last time that only needs slight adjustment, your task is easy, but the judges have already seen the dish. When you're saddled with one of the worst possible situations, however, it's all upside, and you can wow the judges with something totally unexpected. I have no way of knowing for sure, obviously, but I suspect this top mention was as much for being smart as it was for being a good cook. The judges rewarded the wit of finding a way of coping with some distinctly suboptimal product. Spike even seemed to acknowledge this in his line about the judges taking the bait. Which is absolutely fine. But I still have a hard time bumping him more than a few spots. I know, I know. He was on the top. His record already matches Richard's and is better than Angelo's. I just... I just can't. Not yet. If Spike can survive by being the craftiest MFer in the room -- and maybe he can -- I want to see him do it a little more before I kick him up significantly.
|
| 14 |
Tiffany |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
0
|
1
|
| Last Week: 12 |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
0
|
0
|
There's a very fine line between Refined Asian and Asian Lite, and I'm not sure Tiffany's elimination dish didn't fall into the latter category. I seem to remember that coconut curry sauce falling a little flat on both occasions. Still, I don't have a problem with her performance so far. I just haven't seen that much to go on, so we'll see if she can move up in the coming weeks.
|
| 15 |
Tre |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
1
|
0
|
| Last Week: 14 |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
0
|
0
|
Tre is also kind of just treading water down here, being mildly hit and miss in episode one. On the upside, he handled the pork for a top QF dish. On the downside, Jennifer Carroll thought the accompaniments for his cured salmon were all wrong. And while I don't know that I'd listen to any contestant who said so, I'm inclined to value Jen's opinion on an elegant, cured fish dish. I know everybody and their mother thinks I have him too low, and maybe I do. But I want to see something from him besides professionalism and reputation. I want to see a dish that kicks ass. How 'bout it, Tre?
|
| 16 |
Fabio |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
0
|
1
|
| Last Week: 15 |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
0
|
1
|
Now I'm remembering why I found myself wondering if I was coming down too hard on Fabio every week during the S5 Power Rankings. The guy can bust out a killer one-liner, but the things that were articulated about his pasta dish were exactly the kind of things that bugged me about his style the first time around. His pasta just always looks heavy and horribly oversauced to me. I'm not tasting it, I know, but... but... I just get a bad vibe from those photos. Pasta is simplicity. If it looks messy, it probably tastes messy. And the paper is a total conceit. And what's really frustrating about it is that a condimento that's a little saucy with crab and crawfish is something that's crying out to be roasted al cartoccio. Instead of just putting it ON paper, why not actually cook it IN paper? Then it's not a show. Then it means something. And I bet it'd be a better dish. My other frustration with Fabio is that he's coming across yet again as remarkably thin-skinned. Nobody wants to have their work insulted. But you signed on for a reality show, amico. It kind of comes with the territory. It's something you might excuse if this were his first time and he underestimated what it would be like, but Top Chef abuses its contestants, he knows that now, and he voluntarily re-upped. Between that, the grim look on his face and the comments about riding the elevator into hell, he certainly lends the impression that he doesn't really want to be here. And one thing we've learned over seven seasons of Top Chef is that if you don't want to be here, don't worry... you probably won't be for very long.
|
| 17 |
Stephen |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
0
|
1
|
| Last Week: 18 |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
0
|
1
|
Fabio is saved from the basement only because Stephen is one of the most obvious choices I've ever had for the final slot. I appreciate a man with style, but really, when you're cooking in a dress shirt and tie and your knife case looks like it was made by Bottega Veneta, it raises a lot of questions about where your priorities lie. And it shows. Yes, he was dealt one of the tougher hands in the elimination challenge, but he looks completely lost in the kitchen, he's already getting himself into trouble, and he's committing one of the cardinal Top Chef sins of being oblivious to his shortcomings. Over the next 2-3 episodes, I'm not sure which would be the bigger upset: if somebody like Blais or Angelo went home, or if Stephen didn't.
|
| 18 |
Elia |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
0
|
1
|
| Last Week: 17 |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
0
|
1
|
Elia's one of the ones I had a hard time explaining or justifying why I put her where I did, so on a purely selfish level I'm glad to see her depart right about on schedule. That disconnect between her and the judges that I mentioned last week? Here it was again. She thought her dish was great. They didn't. And I forgot to mention last week that the only reason Elia finished 3rd instead of 8th in S2 was because Mia wanted to go home and threw herself on the grenade, volunteering to leave, to save Elia. If not for that act, Elia would have finished in the bottom half of what is widely regarded (even if I don't agree) as the weakest season in the history of the show. Tom says in his blog that Elia's was the only dish of the lot that was actually worse the second time around. She didn't address the conceptual issues, she served the fish raw, and there's really no getting around that. There's an interview with her in the Chicago Tribune that I haven't yet read for fear of spoilers (I hope somebody will give me the all clear on that once they do or don't come to fruition), in which -- and please correct me if I have this wrong -- I understand she complains that they were told not to stray too far from the original dish and she followed the rules while the others didn't. To which I guess the logical responses would be 1) if everybody else strayed, wouldn't you think that perhaps you weren't the one to get the memo, and 2) what does that have to do with badly undercooking your fish? But the worst kind of criticism is criticism of something you haven't even read yourself, so I probably shouldn't even be mentioning this. Bottom line, it seemed like a solid elimination.
|